In my baytail T platform, it is still exist. > Before leaving office, I have built the latest beignet. I will try it > again tomorrow. > Thanks. > > Yan Wang > >> Can't reproduce it here. Did you use the latest git master? >> >> The latest git version is >> commit 33a043e903f9d61445d3fb7972becf83c2842276 >> Author: Junyan He <junyan...@linux.intel.com> >> Date: Thu Oct 23 13:09:00 2014 +0800 >> >> Add the disasm support for Gen8 >> >> Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan...@linux.intel.com> >> Reviewed-by: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com> >> Reviewed-by: "Yang, Rong R" <rong.r.y...@intel.com> >> >> >> Just a reminder, when report a bug/issue, please update to the latest >> git >> master version and test it again and if it could reproduce please write >> done the git hash in the report. >> >> Thanks, >> Zhigang Gong. >> >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 03:24:01AM -0700, yan.w...@linux.intel.com >> wrote: >>> Hi, All, >>> I found one possible bug for review. >>> if run the following: >>> ./opencv_test_imgproc --gtest_filter=OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat*. >>> OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 failed and continue. But the whole >>> test >>> flow will crash in OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257: >>> [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/240, where GetParam() = (CV_8U, >>> Channels(2), 7, 1, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (6433 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 (358 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 (311 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 (6 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 (203 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 (207 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 (203 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 (7 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 (210 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 (207 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 (208 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 (7 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 (214 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 (207 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 (212 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 >>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 (7 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 >>> /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:106: >>> Failure >>> Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst, udst)) <= (threshold), actual: >>> 255 >>> vs 1 >>> Size: [92 x 61] >>> >>> /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:107: >>> Failure >>> Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst_roi, udst_roi)) <= (threshold), >>> actual: 255 vs 1 >>> Size: [92 x 61] >>> >>> [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256, where GetParam() = (CV_8U, >>> Channels(2), 7, 4, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (7413 ms) >>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 >>> opencv_test_imgproc: /home/yanwang/beignet/src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c:703: >>> intel_gpgpu_check_binded_buf_address: Assertion >>> `gpgpu->binded_buf[i]->offset != 0' failed. >>> Segmentation fault (core dumped) >>> >>> But if I run OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 only, it passed. I think >>> 256 >>> case may influence it. >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Yan Wang >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Beignet mailing list >>> Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org >>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet >> _______________________________________________ >> Beignet mailing list >> Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet >> > > _______________________________________________ > Beignet mailing list > Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet >
_______________________________________________ Beignet mailing list Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet