Update: Under root account, it will crash. Under user account(e.g. yanwang), it will pass.
> In my baytail T platform, it is still exist. > >> Before leaving office, I have built the latest beignet. I will try it >> again tomorrow. >> Thanks. >> >> Yan Wang >> >>> Can't reproduce it here. Did you use the latest git master? >>> >>> The latest git version is >>> commit 33a043e903f9d61445d3fb7972becf83c2842276 >>> Author: Junyan He <[email protected]> >>> Date: Thu Oct 23 13:09:00 2014 +0800 >>> >>> Add the disasm support for Gen8 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Junyan He <[email protected]> >>> Reviewed-by: Zhigang Gong <[email protected]> >>> Reviewed-by: "Yang, Rong R" <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Just a reminder, when report a bug/issue, please update to the latest >>> git >>> master version and test it again and if it could reproduce please write >>> done the git hash in the report. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Zhigang Gong. >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 03:24:01AM -0700, [email protected] >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, All, >>>> I found one possible bug for review. >>>> if run the following: >>>> ./opencv_test_imgproc --gtest_filter=OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat*. >>>> OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 failed and continue. But the whole >>>> test >>>> flow will crash in OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257: >>>> [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/240, where GetParam() = >>>> (CV_8U, >>>> Channels(2), 7, 1, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (6433 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 (358 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 (311 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 (6 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 (203 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 (207 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 (203 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 (7 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 (210 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 (207 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 (208 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 (7 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 (214 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 (207 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 (212 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 >>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 (7 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 >>>> /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:106: >>>> Failure >>>> Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst, udst)) <= (threshold), actual: >>>> 255 >>>> vs 1 >>>> Size: [92 x 61] >>>> >>>> /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:107: >>>> Failure >>>> Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst_roi, udst_roi)) <= (threshold), >>>> actual: 255 vs 1 >>>> Size: [92 x 61] >>>> >>>> [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256, where GetParam() = >>>> (CV_8U, >>>> Channels(2), 7, 4, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (7413 ms) >>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 >>>> opencv_test_imgproc: >>>> /home/yanwang/beignet/src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c:703: >>>> intel_gpgpu_check_binded_buf_address: Assertion >>>> `gpgpu->binded_buf[i]->offset != 0' failed. >>>> Segmentation fault (core dumped) >>>> >>>> But if I run OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 only, it passed. I think >>>> 256 >>>> case may influence it. >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Yan Wang >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Beignet mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Beignet mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Beignet mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet >> > > _______________________________________________ > Beignet mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet > _______________________________________________ Beignet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
