Hi Ketan, If you are referring to interconnecting v4 only sites draft I have number of comments:
* The draft is not needed at all * we can seamlessly interconnect v4 sites over v6 core using v4 mapped v6 addresses * Zero control plane change is required/needed * number of vendors are shipping it Moreover sites even if today speaking v4 only sooner then later will talk also v6. We can not ship a std track document which makes v6 deployment harder or no-op for any site. Best, Robert On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, 11:19 Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gyan, > > Sharing a couple of suggestions here for your 5 drafts (4 in BESS + 1 in > IDR) as we lost time due to the audio issues: > > (1) put the portions to be standardized (very focussed/small hopefully) in > one single draft and post/share with both IDR and BESS since you are > changing NH encoding (from what I heard?) > (2) all other informational/BCP material could be combined in a single > draft (perhaps the existing BESS WG draft) > > IMHO, that would facilitate an appropriate focussed review of the > content/proposals. > > Thanks, > Ketan > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
