Hi Linda In addition, there seems to be an issue with the authors list. You have 7 listed at the header of the draft and in the authors section. The data tracker is only picking up 6 of these (not sure why). As you know, the RFC editor likes to restrict this to 5 unless there is a really good reason why there should be more.
One way to resolve this is to list the editors as authors and move others to a ‘contributors’ section. Please can you resolve this. Thanks Matthew From: BESS <[email protected]> on behalf of Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 26 June 2023 at 11:14 To: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [bess] Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07 Hi Linda ID Nits is showing many errors in the references used in the draft (author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-09.txt<https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-09.txt>). I think this is because there are differences in the format used for the reference in the body text, and the bookmark in the references section is different. For example: == Missing Reference: 'RFC 4364' is mentioned on line 162, but not defined But the references section says: [RFC4364] E. rosen, Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private networks (VPNs)", Feb 2006. There is no space between RFC and 4364. Also, please can you fix all the other ID-Nits issues before I request publication. Thanks Matthew From: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 27 March 2023 at 08:07 To: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07 CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See http://nok.it/ext for additional information. Matthew, The revision based on your comments and suggestions has been uploaded: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage/ What is the next step for moving this draft forward to IESG? Thank you. Linda From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2023 8:23 PM To: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07 Thanks Linda This looks fine to me. Regards Matthew From: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, 21 March 2023 at 22:40 To: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07 CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See http://nok.it/ext for additional information. Matthew, Thank you very much for the detailed review. All your comments have been addressed. Please see the attached changes. We will upload the revision next Monday. Thank you. Linda From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 7:01 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07 Authors, As is customary, please find attached my documents shepherd’s review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07. There are a fair number of mostly editorial comments scattered throughout the draft, prefixed by ‘MB>’. Please treat these as you would any other WG last call comments. Best regards Matthew
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
