jqt syntax highlight is implemented by c++ code inside jqt source. I think there is a difficulty to highlight DD noun correctly, but I might be wrong.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, 9:06 AM Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > There are two things I would like to see for direct definition which > are not currently implemented. I do not know if these have any > roadblocks.( If they do have roadblocks, I would like to understand > these blocking issues.) > > [1] Syntax highlighting. Currently, jqt uses a different color for > {{ than for }} in multiline direct definitions. (jhs does not have > this issue.) > > [2] Representation. I would very much like a variant on 5!:5 which > produces a direct definition form which is analogous to linear > representation except that it uses direct definition rather than > explicit definition. (Name use conflicts could be handled by replacing > n=. with 'n'=. and replacing other uses of n with ('n'~), and of > course the same for other reserved names.) > > My primary use of this representation would be in J's default display > (9!:3). > > If you think I should tackle these myself, I guess I can try (though I > suspect I would goof up on my first attempt, and I do not know where > jqt's syntax highlighting code is located). > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
