You don't want to touch the internal representation (which is different
from AR). What is produced by {{ }} is just an explicit definition.
What you want is a switch to display an explicit definition using {{ }}
rather than n : 0. That could be as simple as using {{)x }} .
A different decision is whether you want to remember how a verb was
created, and display it in that form.
Henry Rich
On 10/27/2020 11:02 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
Hmm... actually, this might mean something new -- this approach
suggests delving into the atomic rep, finding the explicit definitions
and converting them to dd.
But that implies a less explicit ar which can directly represent a
direct definition. So, for example, making a '{{' token which has a
modifier indicating type (for example )a or )v or whatever), followed
by the direct definition text. Probably followed by an inert '}}'
token to make the ddrep implementation simpler...
I would definitely want Eric to weigh in on a design change that hits
the system this deeply.
Thanks,
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
