That anomaly, fortunately, seems to be gone, 9!:14 '' j601/beta/2006-06-10/20:00 m=. ] [ m
It would have had puzzling implications related to the rule (or the bending rule, depending on your point of view) for empties. > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:31 AM > To: 'Beta forum' > Subject: RE: [Jbeta] selective implicit fixing? > > > Apparently it is only one-level fixing, as opposed to full recursive > fixing > and an (unintended?) consequence related to the famous (or infamous, > depending on one's viewpoint) x y u v m n J6 change. > > m=. a > > [ m > [ a > > > > > Behalf Of Jose Mario Quintana > > 9!:14 '' > > j601/beta/2006-04-05/10:10 > > > > a=. ] > > [ a > > [ a > > > > m=. ] > > [ m > > [ ] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
