For reference, J602 Package Manager also seems to deal with arbitrarily long 
package captions:

http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/DavidMitchell?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=pacmanj602110107.png

-- 

On 1/7/2011 5:44, bill lam wrote:
> I was wrong. it should be the caption not the description shown.
>
> Maybe pacman in gtkide do things in the hard way by parsing the caption out
> of the manifest. eg, full caption can be retrieved by
>
> 0!:0 'manifest'jpkg'tables/tara'
> 'CAPTION'~
>
> Птн, 07 Янв 2011, David Mitchell писал(а):
>> Interestingly, pacman in gtkide seems to handle the current one line
>> descriptions without truncation:
>>
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/DavidMitchell?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=pacmangtkide110107.png
>> --
>>
>> On 1/6/2011 21:22, bill lam wrote:
>>> I think current jpkg behavior is ok. What should be done is as you
>>> suggested. Reformat description section inside manifest so that the first
>>> line is limited to a maximum width and tells summary of the package. Detail
>>> descriptions (if any) only start in the second line.
>>>
>>> Чтв, 06 Янв 2011, David Mitchell писал(а):
>>>> Well, perhaps one approach would be to publish a "style guide"  that 
>>>> documents
>>>> the limits of the pacman display and suggests a maximum length for the 
>>>> one-line
>>>> package description.  The one line package descriptions only seem to be 
>>>> used on
>>>> the pacman page, not on the description page.
>>>>
>>>> Since the only purpose of the one line description is to be included in the
>>>> pacman display, it seems as if it would be nice if it were helpful 
>>>> determining
>>>> the most important function of the addon.
>>>>
>>>> I found that, imagining I was a new user, the one line description for 
>>>> tara was
>>>> not helpful in determining much about that addon at all.
>>>>
>>>> I certainly would not expect that the full descriptions be included in the
>>>> pacman page.
>>>>
>>>> It does help to know that the full descriptions are available, but I felt 
>>>> there
>>>> would be utility in having the one line descriptions be as meaningful as 
>>>> possible.
>>>>
>>>> Another idea would be to make the one line descriptions clickable links 
>>>> that
>>>> take you to the long description for that addon.
>>>>
>>>> On 1/6/2011 16:03, Eric Iverson wrote:
>>>>> I misunderstood your  original report. I assumed you meant the report
>>>>> resulting from pressing Descriptions button (which is complete and not
>>>>> truncated).
>>>>>
>>>>> I now understand your report but am not sure if anything can or should be
>>>>> done. Does knowing about that the full descriptions are available help? As
>>>>> Ric points out the other reports are necessarily summaries.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:25 PM, David 
>>>>> Mitchell<[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please see this link:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/DavidMitchell?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=pacman110106.png
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/6/2011 11:54, Eric Iverson wrote:
>>>>>>> I don't see this in JHS pacman. Are you perhaps reporting a problem with
>>>>>>> JGTK pacman?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:35 AM, David Mitchell<[email protected]
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The pacman window (using Firefox) seems to cut off the descriptions of
>>>>>>>> packages
>>>>>>>> at an arbitrary width giving non-scrollable results like this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>            tables/tara     1.2.11 Platform independent system for 
>>>>>>>> reading
>>>>>> an...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to