Uh-oh. I've been doing financial calculations with J and the following (old) bug report is an alarm for me. Have to look at my codes again.
What is the minimal condition for the bug? On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Roger Stokes < [email protected]> wrote: > Still got this old bug in j701: > > JVERSION > Engine: j701/2011-01-07/14:33 > Library: 7.01.030 > Platform: Win 32 > Installer: j701a_win.exe > InstallPath: c:/users/homer/j701 > > 1 0 2 +/ @: * (3 2 $ 3 1 2 1 1 0) > 7 3 > > NB. The result 7 3 is wrong. > NB. The correct result is 5 1, shown by replacing + > NB. with an equivalent verb, say +"0 . > > 1 0 2 +"0 / @: * (3 2 $ 3 1 2 1 1 0) > 5 1 > > NB. This has been mentioned before, firstly > NB. by Patrick Van Beek on 14 6 2008. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
