On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Tikkanz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Seems to work OK for me. Maybe it is architecture/processor dependent?
64 Bit Platforms are only affected for boolean arguments:
NB. On J64-701 Windows
1 0 2 (+/@:*) (3 2 $ 3 1 2 1 1 0)
5 1 NB. Correct
1 0 1 (+/@:*) (3 2 $ 1 1 1 1 1 0)
2 2 NB. Incorrect
>
> JVERSION
> Engine: j701/2011-01-07/14:33
> Library: 7.01.030
> Platform: Linux 64
> Installer: j701a_linux64.sh
> InstallPath: /usr/local/lib/j64_701
>
> 1 0 2 +/ @: * (3 2 $ 3 1 2 1 1 0)
> 5 1
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:10 AM, June Kim (김창준) <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Uh-oh. I've been doing financial calculations with J and the following (old)
>> bug report is an alarm for me. Have to look at my codes again.
>>
>> What is the minimal condition for the bug?
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Roger Stokes <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Still got this old bug in j701:
>>>
>>> JVERSION
>>> Engine: j701/2011-01-07/14:33
>>> Library: 7.01.030
>>> Platform: Win 32
>>> Installer: j701a_win.exe
>>> InstallPath: c:/users/homer/j701
>>>
>>> 1 0 2 +/ @: * (3 2 $ 3 1 2 1 1 0)
>>> 7 3
>>>
>>> NB. The result 7 3 is wrong.
>>> NB. The correct result is 5 1, shown by replacing +
>>> NB. with an equivalent verb, say +"0 .
>>>
>>> 1 0 2 +"0 / @: * (3 2 $ 3 1 2 1 1 0)
>>> 5 1
>>>
>>> NB. This has been mentioned before, firstly
>>> NB. by Patrick Van Beek on 14 6 2008.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
