Seems to work OK for me. Maybe it is architecture/processor dependent? JVERSION Engine: j701/2011-01-07/14:33 Library: 7.01.030 Platform: Linux 64 Installer: j701a_linux64.sh InstallPath: /usr/local/lib/j64_701
1 0 2 +/ @: * (3 2 $ 3 1 2 1 1 0) 5 1 On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:10 AM, June Kim (김창준) <[email protected]> wrote: > Uh-oh. I've been doing financial calculations with J and the following (old) > bug report is an alarm for me. Have to look at my codes again. > > What is the minimal condition for the bug? > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Roger Stokes < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Still got this old bug in j701: >> >> JVERSION >> Engine: j701/2011-01-07/14:33 >> Library: 7.01.030 >> Platform: Win 32 >> Installer: j701a_win.exe >> InstallPath: c:/users/homer/j701 >> >> 1 0 2 +/ @: * (3 2 $ 3 1 2 1 1 0) >> 7 3 >> >> NB. The result 7 3 is wrong. >> NB. The correct result is 5 1, shown by replacing + >> NB. with an equivalent verb, say +"0 . >> >> 1 0 2 +"0 / @: * (3 2 $ 3 1 2 1 1 0) >> 5 1 >> >> NB. This has been mentioned before, firstly >> NB. by Patrick Van Beek on 14 6 2008. >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
