Dan Sully said the following on 01/26/2006 04:54 PM: > * bglad shaped the electrons to say... > >> i saw the same no-web-UI problem on the 25,24,23,18th jan versions of >> 6.5b1 on windows. solved by using 6.2 but a waste of time... >> >> pls could 'beta' be used in its conventional sense as software that is >> stable (on test systems at least) rather than 'experimental'? 'alpha' >> seems more suitable 6.5 at the moment and would save hassle for people >> who aren't monitoring the dev list. > > > http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=18035&highlight=unstable
I can see both sides of this. I run trunk and treat it as alpha - i.e. it breaks occassionally. Perhaps it would be better labelled 6.5alpha and not tagged beta until you feature freeze in preparation for a release? R. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
