ikruspan said the following on 02/27/2006 08:43 PM: > JJZolx Wrote: > >>What you're overlooking is that SlimServer wasn't designed to give >>untrusted parties access to the server. It's intended to be run on a >>private network. > > > I don't agree that security in private network is not needed. Is wife > or children trusted or no ? In my opinion i prefer to restrict access > to setup an have option for "read only" acces. Best solution is to have > user accounts with permisions to functions.
JJ didn't say it wasn't needed; just that it was designed assuming a secure private network. R. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
