> But from this and the other threads about the Service Enabler > it sounds as if that isn't the case. That the initial installation will > now _always_ be as a user application (with the exception you note, > where it had been running as a service), and that you have to then run > the service enabler.
That's correct. > It's not clear to me why all of this functionality isn't just a part of > the the installer. Because it seems to confuse Joe Sixpack. Most users don't care about that choice, and most of those who don't care probably have no idea what a service is (remember that a typical single user XP will log on automatically). So they might start to care because they don't understand. > They'll need to be an Administrator, but that's also going to be a > requirement to successfully run the Service Enabler. That's why I implemented the service enabler as an installer: it's taking care of permissions etc., asking for an admin if needed. That's getting more and more important with Vista. Michael _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
