Mnyb wrote: > My 0.02$ make the searc(hes) smarter , it does not cope well with > misspelled terms etc ?
So, some kind of "fuzzy" search? Based on what though? Not sure how well something like soundex () works in practice. You would probably want to build a table of soundex () values at scan time to check against since it probably be a hefty query to run ad hoc each time. I know there are some other techniques for finding near matches but I don't know which are available in SQLite. Win7Pro(x64)[3.3Ghz i5, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD system, 15TB storage], LMS 7.9.0 -> Logitech Squeezebox Classic V.3 -> Cambridge Audio DacMagic -> NAD C160 -> 2 x NAD C272 -> Quad 22L2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ get.amped's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10022 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101248 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
