pippin wrote: 
> Hm... wouldn't it make sense to get better screens instead? I mean... a
> 50x50 px thumbnail of a 2000x2000 image will never look good, whatever
> you do. And if you use a 300x300 thumbnail (say, no idea why I think of
> that metric) it doesn't really matter that much....
That's a bit like suggesting someone buy a new car instead of tuning the
engine of the one they have.

I'm just thinking that I'd gladly trade some storage space and a little
scanning time for thumbnails that are a little clearer.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101248

_______________________________________________
beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta

Reply via email to