Hi, Oh yeah that's so confusing! http://gplv3.fsf.org/rms-why.html
Our license is "compatible" because of the ".. and later", but if you combine it the code probably becomes v3 exclusively, in its entirety. -Ton- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation [email protected] www.blender.org Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands On 16 Aug, 2010, at 18:10, Martin Poirier wrote: > It would make the rest of the code GPLv3 (GPLv3 isn't compatible > with GPLv2). > > Martin > > --- On Mon, 8/16/10, Tom M <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Tom M <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] libreDWG >> To: "bf-blender developers" <[email protected]> >> Received: Monday, August 16, 2010, 12:03 PM >> Since Blender is GPLv2 or later, and >> this library is GPLv3 or later it >> should be possible legally speaking. >> >> LetterRip >> >> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:49 AM, François T. <[email protected] >> > >> wrote: >>> I was wondering if this lib, in a "legal" point of >> view, would be possible >>> to add to Blender ? >>> >>> >>> François, >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
