hum, seems like some Py binding has been started on this : http://libreplanet.org/wiki/LibreDWG#Bindings_and_extensions http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libredwg.git/tree/bindings/python
2010/8/17 François T. <[email protected]> > bloody hell, it is complicated ! > So maybe it would be better to compile the lib, then bind it w/ python and > make it an addon for easier distribution ? > > > François, > > > 2010/8/16 Ralph Giles <[email protected]> > > On 16 August 2010 10:14, Martin Poirier <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > For audaspace it doesn't matter (LGPLv3 doesn't force anything on the >> rest of the code). >> >> LGPLv3 doesn't force anything on the rest of the code, but the GPLv2 >> does force things on the LGPLv3. That is, the additional protections >> of software freedom incorporated from the GPLv3 in the LGPLv3 count as >> "additional restrictions" as far as the GPLv2 is concerned. I believe >> linking is thus forbidden under the GPLv2's strong-copyleft >> provisions, unless the library falls under the "system library" >> exception. Which wouldn't be the case for a dependency included in the >> blender tree. Therefore any GPLv2+ code gets upgraded to the GPLv3, >> and any GPLv2-only code is a problem. >> >> This was discussed recently in the context of the gnome project. See >> for example starting here: >> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-July/msg00097.html >> >> -r >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > > > > -- > ____________________ > François Tarlier > www.francois-tarlier.com > www.linkedin.com/in/francoistarlier > -- ____________________ François Tarlier www.francois-tarlier.com www.linkedin.com/in/francoistarlier _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
