bloody hell, it is complicated ! So maybe it would be better to compile the lib, then bind it w/ python and make it an addon for easier distribution ?
François, 2010/8/16 Ralph Giles <[email protected]> > On 16 August 2010 10:14, Martin Poirier <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For audaspace it doesn't matter (LGPLv3 doesn't force anything on the > rest of the code). > > LGPLv3 doesn't force anything on the rest of the code, but the GPLv2 > does force things on the LGPLv3. That is, the additional protections > of software freedom incorporated from the GPLv3 in the LGPLv3 count as > "additional restrictions" as far as the GPLv2 is concerned. I believe > linking is thus forbidden under the GPLv2's strong-copyleft > provisions, unless the library falls under the "system library" > exception. Which wouldn't be the case for a dependency included in the > blender tree. Therefore any GPLv2+ code gets upgraded to the GPLv3, > and any GPLv2-only code is a problem. > > This was discussed recently in the context of the gnome project. See > for example starting here: > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-July/msg00097.html > > -r > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > -- ____________________ François Tarlier www.francois-tarlier.com www.linkedin.com/in/francoistarlier _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
