Hi, OK here are the others too, fun to see:
http://www.blender.org/bf/Browser_Linux_Analytics.pdf http://www.blender.org/bf/Browser_OSX_Analytics.pdf Browser type: http://www.blender.org/bf/Browser_Analytics.pdf -Ton- -------------------------------------------------------- Ton Roosendaal - [email protected] - www.blender.org Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A - 1018AD Amsterdam - The Netherlands On 19 May, 2013, at 12:22, Ton Roosendaal wrote: > Hi, > > Here's the last month of Windows visitors for blender.org: > http://www.blender.org/bf/Browser_OS_Analytics.pdf > > One million visits, 70% win7, 14% XP still. > > -Ton- > > -------------------------------------------------------- > Ton Roosendaal - [email protected] - www.blender.org > Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute > Entrepotdok 57A - 1018AD Amsterdam - The Netherlands > > > > On 19 May, 2013, at 3:07, bjornmose wrote: > >> Well our statistics on world wide professionals ( using scientific >> measuring software ) says: >> >> 10% win7, 50% win XP, very few vista the remains even older :) >> and we do full support down to W2k. ( to Daniel .. including Europe , >> USA and former UDSSR ) >> How stupid is that to keep customers satisfied? >> >> Dropping Win8 support is no option, though i hope it will be like >> ignoring 'vista' for good. >> Says the next Win8 (X point anything internally ) will be as nice as Win >> 7 was .. plus providing some nice new features. >> Please no OS religions here, but fencing out XP users is suicide. >> >> Am 17.05.2013 21:38, schrieb Damir Prebeg: >>> My advance apologies for this... After a few days of painful experience I >>> would strongly recommend dropping of Win8 support. >>> >>> >>> On 17 May 2013 17:26, Daniel Genrich <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for that. >>>> >>>> Dropping Win XP would be too soon since many people from south america >>>> and africa are still using Win XP. >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 17.05.2013 15:25, schrieb Thomas Dinges: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> if we do that, we could only build 2 builds. >>>>> >>>>> 32 bit: Compile with vc2008 for Windows XP and above >>>>> 64 bit: Compile with vc2012 for Vista x64 and above >>>>> >>>>> We don't need x64 build for Windows XP, XP x64 is maybe used by 0.1%. >>>>> >>>>> This way all OS / bit configs would be served, and we don't have big >>>>> overhead. >>>>> >>>>> Thomas >>>>> >>>>> Am 17.05.2013 15:14, schrieb Sergey Sharybin: >>>>>> Also, we could do some "gradual" drop: meaning if vc2012's builds would >>>> not >>>>>> be able to run on XP, we could compile two versions of blender -- one >>>> with >>>>>> msvc2008 and other one with msvc2012. We did quite the same thing with >>>>>> linux builds as well (building it against different libc version using >>>>>> older and newer gcc versions). >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Bf-committers mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
