Exactly. The "shadows" checkbox right above the "no caustics" checkbox is another example of how I think it should be..
Am I the only one bugged by this? If not, is it possible that this could be changed? On 08/17/14 10:00, Ronan Ducluzeau wrote: > I think it is just due to historical order of addition. > Caustics were enabled by default before creation of the option. > Cycles guideline was to have every high quality/low rendering feature > enabled by default. > The developer who added the option wanted to disable caustics. > So, he added a "No caustics" option. Maybe at this moment, there was a > problem with saving enabled option of Cycles UI in startup.blend. > > But a "Caustics" option enabled by default like "transparent shadows" one > would be the same that what we have, now. > > > 2014-08-15 3:40 GMT+02:00 gandalf3 <[email protected]>: > >> This has bugged me for a while now.. >> Is there particular reason the "no caustics" option in *render settings >> > light paths* is called "no caustics" as opposed to just "caustics"? >> >> It seems >> ( >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:2.5/Source/Architecture/RNA#Properties >> ) >> it's preferred to avoid such names, so is there some special case here >> that I'm missing? >> >> -- >> -gandalf3 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers -- -gandalf3 _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
