It's rather easy to do to make it consistent without braking render result compatibility. Scripts would break because RNA will change tho.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Bassam Kurdali <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 18:40 -0700, gandalf3 wrote: > > This has bugged me for a while now.. > > Is there particular reason the "no caustics" option in *render settings > > > light paths* is called "no caustics" as opposed to just "caustics"? > - was it a good idea to do it this way? > Not sure! you're right in that it seems like the logic is kinda reversed > on both checkboxes (shadow and caustics) > - is it a good idea to change it now? > Also not sure!!! can this be done and preserve compatibility with > existing files? If not, then I'd vote against this: too many files to > fix...(not to mention python scripts) > > > > It seems > > ( > http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:2.5/Source/Architecture/RNA#Properties > ) > > it's preferred to avoid such names, so is there some special case here > > that I'm missing? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > -- With best regards, Sergey Sharybin _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
