Meh. This too shall pass. On May 19, 4:51 pm, Eric Jome <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah. AT subdomain and euro subdomain. That's silly. > > We can't even agree on a name for these domains. It's cutting against > the grain. You're trying to make a distinction where no distinction > is possible. "Theme Driven" and "Strategy" - those are horrible > names. They don't convey AT and euro... in fact, I contend we > shouldn't even have subdomains about such things! They are > artifiicial, archaic, and arcane distinctions that don't really fit > gaming or gamers, even if they ever did. > > Here's a compromise/solution, which of course will please no one and > not even be considered or accepted like all great compromises in our > time; > > One forum for gamer gamers - serious complex games that don't clearly > fall in another subdomain. Call it "strategy games" because these are > games that require you to have a serious strategy to win. AT games > are like that. Euros are like that. All their confusing hybrid > children are like that. Just think about it. > > Meanwhile, we can have other subdomains for clearly identifiable > groups. Wargames. Children's Games. Party Games. Abstract Games... > and so on. > > But this attempt to build a subdomains for AT and euro is never going > to work. We can't even pick names people like... that ought to be the > first clue. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BGG Down" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
