On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 16:15:16 UTC+10, walkie wrote: > > stackexchange.com has way more users than BGG, so I'm pretty sure it > could absorb an influx of game geeks without it's uptime suffering. The > boardgames subdomain is just one little (less active) branch of it. Many > of the subdomains related to programming are very active. > > I'm not an active user, but they emphasize cleaning up questions and > answers for posterity. This makes its archives extremely useful. It's one > of my go-to places for LaTeX <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX> answers, > for example. > > It would be neat if there were a similarly structured system and culture > for answering rules questions. >
Well, anyone is free to take a game that has a few rules questions and turn it into a rules fAQ wiki page linked from the game's description. I've done a couple of them, and if you add a link from the geeklist I started on that, I'll even pay you a little geekgold for doing it. B> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bgg_down/-/wc0K8Hi-0sIJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
