The great thing about a stackexchange style for rules questions is that as you type in your question it tries to find out if a similar question has been asked and prompts you to check, much better than a wiki on BGG.
On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 07:50:45 UTC+1, Bruce Murphy wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 16:15:16 UTC+10, walkie wrote: >> >> stackexchange.com has way more users than BGG, so I'm pretty sure it >> could absorb an influx of game geeks without it's uptime suffering. The >> boardgames subdomain is just one little (less active) branch of it. Many >> of the subdomains related to programming are very active. >> >> I'm not an active user, but they emphasize cleaning up questions and >> answers for posterity. This makes its archives extremely useful. It's one >> of my go-to places for LaTeX <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX> answers, >> for example. >> >> It would be neat if there were a similarly structured system and culture >> for answering rules questions. >> > > Well, anyone is free to take a game that has a few rules questions and > turn it into a rules fAQ wiki page linked from the game's description. I've > done a couple of them, and if you add a link from the geeklist I started on > that, I'll even pay you a little geekgold for doing it. > > B> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bgg_down/-/3eisfs-eFCcJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
