They also have preemptive closures by the moderators, and a couple moderators who are excessively narrow-minded... and a wide range of "not a good fit for our Q&A format."
Yes, I'm on there. No, I'm not a fan of the moderator staff. On Jul 9, 10:15 pm, walkie <[email protected]> wrote: > stackexchange.com has way more users than BGG, so I'm pretty sure it could > absorb an influx of game geeks without it's uptime suffering. The > boardgames subdomain is just one little (less active) branch of it. Many > of the subdomains related to programming are very active. > > I'm not an active user, but they emphasize cleaning up questions and > answers for posterity. This makes its archives extremely useful. It's one > of my go-to places for LaTeX <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX> answers, > for example. > > It would be neat if there were a similarly structured system and culture > for answering rules questions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
