On 26 Jan 2009, at 6:22 PM, Maxwell, Adam R wrote: > On 01/26/09 07:50, "Christiaan Hofman" <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is it worthwhile to move the changes to the bibdesk tree? > > It's not worth /my/ while, but I can't speak for anyone else :). > >> I also did >> some rewrite of the layout, and they split quite a while ago. So it >> may be quite nontrivial to merge back in. > > Definitely not easy to merge, even though I'm not sure of the extent > of your > changes for layout. I don't think I changed the API, but I use > stretchy > space between icons now, and I think tiling is simpler. The internal > datasource and bindings stuff would also cause difficulty. > > The icon/caching changes would be straightforward to merge, by > comparison. > In fact, I had most of that done last summer, but never checked it > in since
you mean in bibdesk? > > I didn't have time to fully test it. I've still got that sitting > around, > but it looks to be missing at least FVCoreTextIcon (an attempt to work > around ATS memory corruption) and the fv_zone stuff. So the interaction of the operation+cache+icon stuff with the rest (fileview/controller) is still the same? Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
