On Mar 25, 2014, at 15:12 , Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 25, 2014, at 20:53, Reto Stöckli wrote: > >> One more thing. >> >> If you can propagate a flag from the Search GUI (by means of a >> user-accessible button) into BDSKISIGroupServer.m indicating whether the >> user would like to use WOKSearch or WOKSearchLite, then I can also implement >> the WOKSearchLite SOAP decoding. Most users do not have the full WOKSearch >> access since Thomson Reuters charges extra for it since about one year. >> >> Reto >> > > I don't think we should do this from the search UI, it messes it up and it's > not really an individual search setting. If anything, it should be in the UI > for the search group settings. Though it would need a special UI only for > this search type, which is annoying. As we're not using the database anymore > (is that really true, is it not useful anymore?) we may perhaps appropriate > that for a "Lite" setting? Agree, this should not be set from the search UI itself. It sounds like it should be a separate search group that should be predefined along with the basic WoS search, unless there's an error message from SOAP that would tell you to fall back to WOKSearchLite transparently. Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
