On Apr 6, 2014, at 11:57 , Colin A. Smith <co...@colinsmith.org> wrote:
>>>> And aside about that UID. We currently put that (with the initial WOS: >>>> prefix stripped) in a field called Isi. As that is an obsolete name, >>>> shouldn't we change that to something like Wok, Wok-Id, Wok-Uid, or Uid? >>>> Any preferences? Also, I don't think we should strip the WOS: prefix, as >>>> now we actually support all databases (though I don't know whether the >>>> parsing will work as well for other DBs.) >>> >>> How about simply calling it UID when WOK also calls it this way? >> >> A problem might be that this does not indicate the WOK context. > > I much prefer Wok or Wok-Uid to the other options. How long has it been Isi? Is it likely to foul up anyone's existing search groups and so forth? Renaming fields that are out in the wild is pretty much never a good idea, IMHO. Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
