> On Apr 12, 2014, at 14:46, Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It is now possible to also search using the Lite service, theUI is also in > place to set this in the search group. So please test it out. I had also > implemented the support for specific (WOS) editions, and changed the default > servers accordingly (and added one for the whole of WOS, should we also add > some for other databases?) I have put the UID in a field Wok-Uid, is that OK > for everyone?
That's fine with me. > As for the alternate operations, I am not completely sure about it, though I > guess something like citations can be useful. I hate the syntax as it now is: > the prefixes are far too long, and the syntax is inconsistent, and using ":" > is wrong IMHO because that character also occurs in the UID. I propose to use > something that looks more like the search syntax, by devising some alternate > "search fields", for instance CITED=, CITING=, REL=, and UID=. Those are all > unused. I don't have any strong preferences about the syntax. I think CITEDBY is less ambiguous than CITED, though two characters longer. I think CITING is good, and that's the only one I really care about. Cheers, Colin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud. http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
