On Apr 6, 2014, at 13:58 , Christiaan Hofman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Apr 6, 2014, at 22:51, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > >> >> On Apr 6, 2014, at 13:42, Christiaan Hofman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> It cannot foul up any search group, it's output, not input. >> >> Mistyped. Meant static/smart/field group, of course. Users won't notice >> renaming. > > > It cannot foul up any reasonable group. The ID looks like some arbitrary, > unique, number. In fact it's not even necessarily a number. So it would be > completely inappropriate and useless for smart or field groups. And static > groups don't rely on fields. Duh, I knew that :). I just have vague memories of adding a field like this to one of the groups at some user's specific request. Maybe it was times-cited or something like that? Does WoS use it for cross-referencing entries? I could be mixing it up with the PubMed group… -- Adam
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
