On May 5, 2009, at 3:32 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:

It would be great to test for equality of records modulo author
name for the
same record retrieved via the regular parser.

There'll be some differences, since I don't attempt to handle all of
the
fields.  The XML format documentation seems strongly oriented towards
@article types, so I'd be curious as to how a proceedings or book
with an
editor is handled.  I think I've done a better job at handling MeSH
headings
and keyword lists, but a bunch of stuff is just ignored since it looks
irrelevant (e.g. status, ownership).  Additions would be up to the
PubMed-using crowd.

regards,
Adam



This line in the DTD may be relevant:

<!ELEMENT Book (%PubDate.Ref;, Publisher, Title, AuthorList?,
                CollectionTitle?, Volume?)>

What DTD did you find that in? I have yet to see a book example, and there's no point in adding code without a test case. Book doesn't appear in the type list, and there's no element description for CollectionTitle at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/licensee/elements_descriptions.html .

Also ElocationID (DOI) and PublicationTypeList may be interesting.

I get DOI from PubmedData/ArticleIDList/ArticleID, and haven't yet seen an actual use of ElocationID.

I looked at PublicationTypeList originally, but most of them don't map to BibTeX in a straightforward way (Twin Study? Randomized Controlled Trial? Festschrift?). All the metadata provided is geared towards @article types, so that seems a sensible default.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to