On 5 May 2009, at 4:02 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > > On May 5, 2009, at 3:32 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > >>>> It would be great to test for equality of records modulo author >>>> name for the >>>> same record retrieved via the regular parser. >>> >>> There'll be some differences, since I don't attempt to handle all of >>> the >>> fields. The XML format documentation seems strongly oriented >>> towards >>> @article types, so I'd be curious as to how a proceedings or book >>> with an >>> editor is handled. I think I've done a better job at handling MeSH >>> headings >>> and keyword lists, but a bunch of stuff is just ignored since it >>> looks >>> irrelevant (e.g. status, ownership). Additions would be up to the >>> PubMed-using crowd. >>> >>> regards, >>> Adam >>> >> >> >> This line in the DTD may be relevant: >> >> <!ELEMENT Book (%PubDate.Ref;, Publisher, Title, AuthorList?, >> CollectionTitle?, Volume?)> > > What DTD did you find that in?
NLMCommon DTD from <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/DTD/index.html >. > I have yet to see a book example, and there's no point in adding > code without a test case. Book doesn't appear in the type list, and > there's no element description for CollectionTitle at > http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/licensee/elements_descriptions.html > . > >> Also ElocationID (DOI) and PublicationTypeList may be interesting. > > I get DOI from PubmedData/ArticleIDList/ArticleID, and haven't yet > seen an actual use of ElocationID. > > I looked at PublicationTypeList originally, but most of them don't > map to BibTeX in a straightforward way (Twin Study? Randomized > Controlled Trial? Festschrift?). All the metadata provided is > geared towards @article types, so that seems a sensible default. It's precisely this kind of questions, that I cannot answer and are a lot of work to figure out (especially if you're not a user) why I don't want to do it ;-) Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
