Understanding and interpreting most laws is much more difficult that
just reading one or two particular laws and repeating these back to
someone in print or verbally.   What is missing from this discussion on
when is it permissible for bicyclists to ride two abreast is an
understanding of the basic law on operating bicycles on the roadway,
346.80, which itself requires an understand of the safe passing law,
346.075.  

346.80 says that when the unsafe condition of a lane that is too narrow
for a bicycle and a motor vehicle to be operated side by side in the
lane exists, the bicyclist can move further left in the lane to ensure
that a following motorist who wants to pass will pass safely by using
the adjacent lane on a multi--lane road or the opposing lane on a two
lane road.  In this case, when a single bicyclist's legal lane position
is riding further out in the lane, bicyclists can also ride two abreast.
In neither case, with either a single bicyclist riding further out in a
narrow lane or two bicyclists riding side by side in a narrow lane,
is/are the bicyclist(s) impeding traffic.  They are in a legal lane
position in the narrow lane and the following motorist has a legal
obligation to slow down and follow safely until there is a legal and
safe opportunity to pass by using the adjoining/opposing lane to legally
pass while giving the bicycist(s) a minimum of three feet of clearance
per 346.075.  

There are other factors that can play into interpreting these laws as
well.  For example, what is the speed limit and the speed at which the
bicyclists are operating?  If the bicyclists are operating at the posted
or statutory speed limit, they cannot be assumed to be impeding traffic
by riding two abreast.

Thus the answer to the question  "Do bikes have to ride single file?" is
more accurately something like "It depends upon the conditions existing
at that place and time . . . " 

Arthur


Arthur Ross, Pedestrian-Bicycle Coordinator
City of Madison Traffic Engineering Division
215 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Suite 100
PO Box 2986
Madison, WI  53701-2986
608/266-6225

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Darin Burleigh
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 7:51 PM
To: George Hesselberg; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bikies] single file response

At 2:48 PM -0500 9/16/06, George Hesselberg wrote:
>Here are the relevant paragraphs from the Wisconsin Bicycle Federation 
>website summary of Wisconsin traffic laws as they relate to riding 
>single file.  (The  WBF does a nice job on all its law summaries.)  The

>laws do not, in fact, mention "single file."  They refer to "riding 2
abreast."
>However, they are quite simple.  Though some believe there is a vast 
>media conspiracy involved in this, there is not.  Whining about 
>conspiracies does not - and in this case did not - answer the question.

GeorgeH,

GeorgeP's main concern, which I share, is that neither of the columns
clearly answered the answer; and I think you would have to agree. As you
point out, the state statutes are very simple. So, if the question is

"Do bikes have to ride single file?"

The answer is

"No.
According to state law, bicyclists may ride two abreast, except when
doing so would impede traffic."

Is that so hard? A few examples might have helped to illustrate the
point. But I also share GeorgeP's concern that the 'interpretation'
given by Lt. Hansen was not helpful.

Mr. Perkins's second point is about the inferred editorial slant to the
column. He was not 'whining' about any conspiracies, vast or otherwise.
I don't pretend to know what the author(s) intended, but I do have
first-hand knowledge of ignorant, hostile motorists who feel entitled to
threaten my safety because they think I am breaking the law.

My concern is that the sub-text of the question is 'why the hell are
those bikers in my way?'.

Regardless of what the author(s) were trying to say, or how they quoted
a State Patrol officer, the take-home message for these would-be
vigilantes is that the columns have confirmed their suspicion that
'bikes are not allowed to get in my way'.

A simple 'bicyclists are entitiled to an entire lane' would have been
helpful.

-darin

--  -- -- -- -- -- --
Darin Burleigh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to