To those who have responded to my post -- my message was not solely directed to Pam. There were references that I made directed to Pam and the messages on her site. I stand by my opinion that I felt several of the messages she relayed on her site were unprofessional and did not contribute to my understanding of what she can bring to the board or how she could help improve our cycling community. Doug, there is appropriate humour and inappropriate humour for the context of the particular situation.
Some of my comments were aimed at the entire constituency on this list -- particularly the comments about how too many people on the list were drilling into what seemed like petty bickering and finger pointing (the first statement in my email). Again, in my opinion, too much energy has been wasted in those words. Pam Barrett "appears" to be the candidate who was the implied representative for these individuals -- and all that followed was more blame, finger pointing and derogatory comments, most without concrete evidence that I could see. The intention was not meant to be inflammatory personally to any one person - the intention was to cite the examples I think are detrimental to the overall goals this entire community should be trying to achieve -- in a positive, not negative fashion. Everyone here has a responsibility to take it forward. Focusing on incomplete or unfounded accusations is not a way to do this. Sharing and communicating how you as a bikie, or you as a future board member can help our bike community progress, in my opinion, most definitely is. Sincere apologies for any offense, please take my message as a call to move ahead. Renee
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
