Ah, of course. Evidently, I have get my sarcasm detector calibrated.
On 10/5/07, Liz Zelandais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ummmm.... I think each of Ms. Freiwald's comments would fall under the > category of "facetious". (And I'm sure most of us join her in gritting our > collective teeth at what Jeff Schimpff so aptly defined as "a model for > all the spin-doctoring that has been going on at the federal level for > decades, with the level of egregiousness having climbed precipitously in the > past 7 years.") > > Liz > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Tom Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, October 5, 2007 11:30:35 AM > Subject: Re: [Bikies] FW: Official Bike Path Response > > This is not a personal response. This is a form letter. > > See here: http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc24/kukusz/Picture2.png > > Others have gotten an identical letter. > > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *On Behalf Of *Ann Freiwald > > *Sent:* Friday, October 05, 2007 10:30 AM > > *To:* Reed Dunbar; Sarah Gaskell; [email protected] > > *Subject:* [Bikies] FW: Official Bike Path Response > > > > This is the nice personal letter I got back from the Sec. of > > Transportation after I complained about her remarks on the Jim Lehrer Report > > about a month ago. I am no longer worried about how much the feds care about > > biking and walking. Obviously all is well with Ms. Peters in charge. > > > > > > > > Ann M. Freiwald, ASLA > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bikies mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies > >
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
