Ummmm.... I think each of Ms. Freiwald's comments would fall under the category
of "facetious". (And I'm sure most of us join her in gritting our collective
teeth at what Jeff Schimpff so aptly defined as "a model for all the
spin-doctoring that has been going on at the federal level for decades, with
the level of egregiousness having climbed precipitously in the past 7 years.")
Liz
----- Original Message ----
From: Tom Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2007 11:30:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Bikies] FW: Official Bike Path Response
This is not a personal response. This is a form letter.
See here: http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc24/kukusz/Picture2.png
Others have gotten an identical letter.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ann Freiwald
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 10:30 AM
To: Reed Dunbar; Sarah Gaskell; [email protected]
Subject: [Bikies] FW: Official Bike Path Response
This is the nice personal letter I got back from the Sec. of Transportation
after I complained about her remarks on the Jim Lehrer Report about a month
ago. I am no longer worried about how much the feds care about biking and
walking. Obviously all is well with Ms. Peters in charge.
Ann M. Freiwald, ASLA
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
