I think you missed the question - I think it ought to be how many pinheads dance on the head of a anti-cycle (insert your party here) politician.
Hey, lets bash everybody DJ --- On Mon, 1/12/09, Eric Westhagen <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Eric Westhagen <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Bikies] Republicans: Bike paths are not infrastructure > To: [email protected], "BikiesSubmissions" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, January 12, 2009, 1:27 PM > <div id=yiv1800840082><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC > "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> > <html> > <head> > > </head> > > Dear Republican Bashers:<br> > <br> > It is one thing to promote biking and anything to do with > biking on > this list, but to now expand your little tirade which > began in the > middle of last night, has no call on this site. Maybe > you should > debate: "How many Republicans can Dance on the Head of > a Pin?"<br> > <br> > EW<br> > <br> > <a rel="nofollow" > class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" > target="_blank" > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a> > wrote: > <blockquote > > type="cite"> > <pre>As much as I'd like to firmly apply the > "superhighway socialist" label > to Boehner, he actually does have a record of trying (and > failing) to > eliminate the federal highway pork that is the main culprit > behind our > so-called "crumbling bridges and highways" that > got a $16 bil bailout > from congress last year. He also opposed the automaker > bailout, though > that opposition may have been partially an effort to oppose > requiring > automakers to invest in "green" technologies. > > I believe anti-bike comments like this are exemplary of the > primary > fault with conservative thought: Nobody, not even a > conservative, is > going to support cutting government services that benefit > them - so that > means the primary victims of the conservative pruning > shears have to be > minority groups that lack the political power to remove > conservatives > from elected office. It is quite ironic that stripping > government > benefits from minority groups has become the mission of a > party that was > originally founded on a platform of granting benefits to a > minority > group. > > </pre> > <blockquote type="cite"> > <pre>-------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Bikies] Republicans: Bike paths are not > infrastructure > From: "Michael D. Barrett" <a > rel="nofollow" > class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" > target="_blank" > href="mailto:[email protected]";><[email protected]></a> > Date: Mon, January 12, 2009 9:40 am > </pre> > </blockquote> > <pre>[snip] > </pre> > <blockquote type="cite"> > <pre>".... But infrastructure, I think > there's a place for infrastructure. > But what kind of infrastructure? Infrastructure to widen > highways to > ease congestion for American families? Is it to build some > buildings > that are necessary? But if we're talking about > beautification > projects or we're talking about bike paths, Americans > are not going > to look very kindly on this." > </pre> > </blockquote> > <pre> > > _______________________________________________ > Bikies mailing list > <a rel="nofollow" > class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" > target="_blank" > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a> > <a rel="nofollow" > class="moz-txt-link-freetext" > target="_blank" > href="http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org";>http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org</a> > > > </pre> > </blockquote> > > </html> > </div>_______________________________________________ > Bikies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
