The presence of those stop signs is precisely why I _DO_NOT_ currently use East Mifflin as my route in that part of town. So what reason was given why TE was reluctant to do the work to actually make E Mifflin an appealing route?
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 16:08 -0500, David Waugh wrote: > TE is not interested in doing diversions or changing any stop signs > so to start with _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
