There was quite a discussion about bike racks in general, and UW's "duckbill"
racks specifically, whilst I was out of the office last week. Here's a bit
more information interspersed with my personal and professional opinions
matter.

 

UW's duckbill racks are not perfect in that they do not work for every bike
out there (indeed, they don't work well for two of my own bikes with front
racks), but they work very well for the majority of bikes out there. They
meet two of Transportation Services' most important criteria - support the
bike in two places, and accommodate locking front wheel and frame with most U
locks - about as good as any alternative I have ever seen, and in fewer
square feet and for half the cost of pretty much everything else.

 

The Saris "City" Rack, which is made locally and very similar to the Dero
"Campus" rack Robbie mentioned, is ~21% wider than the UW duckbill rack, so
it takes up significantly more space to park the same number of bikes. The
Madrax "Sentry" rack, which is very similar to the Creative Pipe Lightning
Bolt Robbie mentioned, is only about 5" wider than the duckbill, but it only
holds 5 bikes when single-sided, and 9 bikes when double-sided (vs 6 bikes on
a UW duckbill single-sided rack or 11 bikes on a double-sided duck). Either
way, reduction of more than 20% of the nearly 10,000 bike parking stalls on
our campus would be a calamity since we are not yet meeting even current
demand for bike parking.

 

Mike Rewey's objections to them, point by point:

 

I think the arguments that they bend easily are a bit overblown. Yes, they
tend to crumple when hit with UW's very large snow plows at the speed those
vehicles are too often driven. I doubt that the racks in front of the Madison
Municipal Building and City County Building would fare much better if
actually subjected to the same forces. The solution to this problem lies with
the behavior, skill, and attitudes of the snow plow drivers, not with making
a bike rack that will withstand a one-ton dump truck with a plow blade on the
full load of sand traveling faster than they arguably should.

 

They do actually fit the majority of bikes, even most of those with fenders.
I have tested "29ers" (i.e. bikes with very wide 700c tires) with fenders on
them without a problem. If you have a bike with bigger tires/fenders than
that (and they do exist - http://fatbikealaska.blogspot.com/) then locking it
at a rack is perhaps not your biggest challenge. Front racks are a different
story; most any front rack will preclude using the duckbill the way it was
intended. Indeed, the two bikes I ride most often have front racks, so I
either use a different rack (such as one of the many inverted U racks on
campus) or lock up to the outside of the end of a duckbill rack when that
space is available. But while front fenders are becoming more vogue (and have
always been useful), they still aren't nearly as common as, say, bike racks
that don't support the bike in two places.

 

I suppose Mike has a point that the duckbill racks are potential wheel
benders, but that's just as true of the Sentry/Lightning Bolt racks. And
racks that show you where to put your front wheel help avoid a significant
problem with other designs (such as inverted Us) - if you lock the front
wheel to the near post of an inverted U, then your bike generally is
encroaching upon the access aisle, which often serves as a pedestrian way
(aka "sidewalk"), blocking peds, and also those pesky snow plows. If everyone
knew how to use each kind of rack, that would be great, but they don't, and I
personally don't have time to teach 6000 new kids every August. A rack that
is intuitive tends to keep the bikes more orderly. There are grids of
inverted U racks all over campus with bikes locked to them that have fallen
down, or are extending out into the access aisles, or otherwise aren't really
serving their purpose well. Inverted U racks do work well for parking very
large cargo bikes, or bikes with large front racks. 

 

Debris is not that hard to clean out of a duckbill by a human being with a
broom, which is how it's often done on campus (the staffer who swept under
the duckbills I reconfigured and re-installed on the SE corner of the
Memorial Union last spring told me he thought the new configuration was a big
improvement as he was sweeping). Perhaps the city should buy more brooms and
fewer gasoline powered leaf blowers that are so loud their operators need ear
protection (but what about everybody else on the street? It's illegal for me
to even wear headphones while riding down State Street, let alone something
designed to protect my hearing.

The SE corner of the Memorial Union is unfortunately now a big hole in the
ground.

 

They are very difficult to clear of snow. We deal with that by siting as many
racks as we can under shelter where they won't need to be cleared of snow
much. And demand for bike parking on campus after a big snow, while certainly
not nil, drops enough that I can usually find a rack somewhere near my
destination on campus that is at least clear enough to use. I can't always
say the same for the Dero-Campus/Saris-City racks on State Street.

 

In summary, no rack I've seen works for every single bike. We use duckbills
mostly to retrofit existing buildings/racks. And our architects like to spec
inverted U racks for new construction, which works out ok since our machine
shop probably couldn't produce enough duckbills to meet the needs of new
construction anyway. Indeed, we just went to an outside vendor to produce
duckbills for a UW Housing project, they cost more from the outside vendor
than they do from our machine shop, but we got them in four weeks. And the
price was still a lot less than inverted U racks.

 

Let me be clear that we are open to alternatives, but IMO, none of the racks
discussed in this thread is worth twice as much money and 20% more space on
the ground than our own duckbills.

 

 

 

Chuck Strawser

Pedestrian & Bike Coordinator

Commuter Solutions

Transportation Services

UW-Madison

Room 124 WARF

610 Walnut St

Madison WI 53726

608-263-2969

www.wisc.edu/trans

 

________________________________

From: Michael Rewey

 

Unfortunately I am not a real fan of the duckbill racks, there is better
stuff out there. 

 

*                  Like some of you have mentioned they bend easily. 

*                  They don't fit all bikes - especially some with fenders. 

*                  They are potential wheel rim benders. 

*                  They are debris collectors that are hard to clean out. 

*                  They are next to impossible to be cleared of snow in
winter. 

 

I don't recall if the spacing is good.  The new city ordinance will require a
minimum of 2-foot spacing between spaces. 

 

Sorry.  My 2 cents. 

 

Mike Rewey 

 

 

________________________________

From: Robbie Webber

 

Sorry, hit send before I was done.

 

A decent rack will have the following properties: 

 

* Supports the bike frame in two places, so that the bike can be leaned
against the rack. NO FENCE RACKS, that only support the wheel. These can bend
the wheel if the bike is jostled. Also fence racks don't allow:

 

* Accommodates a U-lock, and allows the bike frame and wheel to be locked to
the rack. 

 

* Bike parking spaces are a minimum of 2 feet in width, six feet in length,
with a five foot access aisle (what would be a drive aisle in a parking lot.)
Racks should be placed no closer than 2 feet from a vertical surface, so that
the front wheel doesn't hit the wall/planter/curb when you park at the rack.

 

Some good racks:

 

Dero Racks - Swerve, Bike Hitch, Campus Rack, Hoop Rack, Bike Bike Rack, and
some custom racks

http://www.dero.com/commercial_racks.html

 

Madraxx (local company) - most of the inverted-U-type racks, Advocate Rack,
Keyrac (not sure about this one), Sentry

http://www.madrax.com/Default.aspx?tabid=61&List=0&CategoryID=0&Level=a&SortF
ield=ProductName,ProductName

 

Saris (also local and very nice people) unfortunately still has a limited
number of good racks. Inverted-U and post-n-ring

http://www.saris.com/commercial-parking/commercial-racks.html

[Saris also makes the "city" rack (called "hanging rack" on some of their web
pages), which is equivalent to Dero's Campus rack - chuck]

 

Creative Pipe - Lightning Bolt

http://www.creativepipe.com/lightning_bolt_LR_series_racks.htm

[Madrax "Sentry" is a locally made equivalent to this rack - chuck]

 

Note: Common in Madison, but not good are "wave" racks - like the ones linked
below, and almost every company above has a similar style.

http://www.bikerackshops.com/SARWAVERACK.html

Wave racks do not support the frame well, so the bike falls over, unless you
park parallel to the rack and take up multiple "spaces." Also, the upright
bars are often too close together for mtb handlebars to fit through. Various
other problems with these type of racks, but they are still better than the
old "elementary school-type" fence racks.

 

Hope this helps. Tell your landlord to stop being so, cheap. Oh, and if the
building is newer than 1988, he is required by zoning code to provide bike
racks that meet city code. Older buildings, it's just the right thing to do
for your tenants, and to preserve the trees.

 

 

Robbie

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to