Folks:
Let's not blithely believe that 'light equals safety'. While I'm not an expert, 
I believe multiple studies have shown that increased light is not a significant 
factor in crime-related safety, that community attitudes as seen in 
neighbor-to-neighbor relations and the like are the most significant factor.
 Dave 




________________________________
From: William Hauda <[email protected]>
To: tim wong <[email protected]>; George Perkins <[email protected]>
Cc: Bikies <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, September 30, 2012 5:14:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Bikies] Fwd: SW Commuter Bike Path Lighting and WisDOT Wisconsin 
Bicycle Facility Design Manual--Double Standard


        Tim's right. When you live in a city, light provides safety. 
Not just for bicycling, but for general well-being.

At 03:53 PM 9/30/2012, tim wong wrote:
>Are these anti-lights on the bike path people also proposing getting
>rid of all lights on streets?  My bedroom faces the street and a
>streetlight shines in the window.  So I put blinds up to keep the
>light out when I'm sleeping.  Why can't these people do the same?  I
>also noticed when I rode through there yesterday that the person with
>the large NO LIGHTS sign's house is nowhere near the bike path  (my
>bedroom is at least five times closer to the light than these people's
>would be).  Why the double standard?  Why this blatant disregard for
>safety?  Why does anyone listen to them?  The argument should be about
>the most appropriate type of lighting, not whether there should or
>should not be lights.
>
>On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 3:15 PM, George Perkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Still, even if bollards will not provide enough light (this is debatable)
> > due to lack of ambient and other sources of light, then the current design
> > continues to be defective and does not meet the DOT guidelines. The DOT
> > guidelines recommend continuous lighting without gaps of darkness between
> > light poles. The design proposed by the city spaces the light poles too far
> > apart and the result will be alternating patterns of high light intensity
> > with very little or no illumination. The poles need to be closer together.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:43 PM, George Perkins <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>>> why the city hasn't considered a design that follows the DOT guidelines
> > for lighting a bike and pedestrian path<<<
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bikies mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>
>
>
>--
>"If we continue to consume the world until there's no more to consume,
>then there's going to come a day, sure as hell, when our children or
>their children or their children's children are going to look back on
>us--on you and me--and say to themselves, 'My God, what kind of
>monsters were these people?'"
>
>--Daniel Quinn
>_______________________________________________
>Bikies mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to