On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, HIROSHIMA Naoki wrote: >exactly. a slow job with reliable progress meter is much better than a >fast process with no progress meter.
That is true. :) >it is probably not necessary to make it perfectly reliable. >people just want to know what are planned and those priorities. >everyone on this list probably think that the share folder feature will >be implemented sometime soon. and charset support other than us-ascii in >search operation sounds like to be implemented in 1.3.0. >but when we tell these things at somewhere else, it simply leads the >question, "when". True. >would that be supported in next release, 1.2.9 or 1.3.0? if it would be >in 1.3.0, when would be the target release date? in this year or end of >summer in next year? these things. >so, i think it'd be good idea to share what you think or even just vague >idea to interest people who have never used binc. Yes, I agree. >> It might also be interesting to add a bugtracker and so on, but I'll wait >> and see how the community (# of bugreports / feature requests) grows >> first. :-) >i totally agree on this. Okay, I'll throw up something on the Wiki. I can make a couple of pages; one for "what's up for the next/future release(s)" and one for "requested features". Thanks for the feedback, everyone! Andy :-) -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | "It is better not to do something http://www.bincimap.org/ | than to do it poorly."
