On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>I am putting bincimap into production on a customer's mail server
>cluster, and, if all goes well, I'm going to ask for their permission to
>make kind of a 'testimonial' for bincimap. It's a fairly large cluster,
>consisting of 6 machines: 2 customer machines (use for outgoing mail,
>pop, imap, webmail, etc), 2 MX machines, and a 'hot spare' machine.
>I have confidence binc will be able to handle it, and I think something
>like this could certainly be beneficial to the binc community :)
>If they don't go for it I'll just make an anonymous posting about a
>'large ISP' putting binc into production to the mailing list and take it
>from there ;)
Sounds great! Numbers are my best friend; if they can present numbers and
facts, then this is the best way to promote Binc IMAP.
Good: "We are running a 1000 user system averaging 200 simultaneous
connections."
Not so good: "We are running a huge system with extremely many
simultaneous connections."
This goes well with Binc's image; it's plain facts.
The new web pages will have a more professional look and not so much of
the GNU-look they have today. Testimonials are definitely interesting.
This goes for everyone who feels they have something to share about their
experience with Binc. Both good and bad experience is welcome; share your
testimonials.
Andy :-)
--
Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg
Author of Binc IMAP | "It is better not to do something
http://www.bincimap.org/ | than to do it poorly."
