On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Peter Stuge wrote: >On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:14:54PM -0600, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: >> well, as a long time listener, first time user (heh), I would say no to >> mbox. Or at least no until whenever, I'm sure there are features in >> binc that are lacking, or whatever :) There's always something else to >> do besides write mbox support ;) >I agree, Andreas please don't waste time on making a mbox backend unless >someone wants to pay you for it. I'd much rather have e.g. the frontend >(i.e. IMAP protocol) mature further!
No problem; I'll push mbox support way way way down on the priority list. If someone wants mbox support, I can fish it up again. Andy :-) -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | "It is better not to do something http://www.bincimap.org/ | than to do it poorly."
