On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Payal Rathod wrote: >Has anyone used bincimap under heavy load? How well does it work? I mean
I'll let others answer this, as I don't have this experience myself. >a single machine with P-IV and a couple of Gb RAM with qmail, >squirrelmail and apache for webmail only with around 8000 mailboxes, can >bincimap work on it? Does it have a low memory footprint than courier? Courier-IMAP has a lower memory footprint than Binc IMAP. But both footprints are low. >Also, as I said ealier that I heard people saying that bincimap does >not support server side sorting, will that affect the performance? The client should be able to compensate for this. We use the latest Squirrelmail and don't see any performance problems. But the system we're running doesn't have many users. Andy :-) -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | "It is better not to do something http://www.bincimap.org/ | than to do it poorly."
