On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 11:25:02AM +0200, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > Courier-IMAP has a lower memory footprint than Binc IMAP. But both > footprints are low.
Any particular reason other that "setting up is easy" that I would want to use bincimap? I always love trying new things. > The client should be able to compensate for this. We use the latest > Squirrelmail and don't see any performance problems. But the system we're > running doesn't have many users. How about telling me, maybe offlist, how to get squirrelmail with bincimap ... I mean the "." and "/" thing. With warm regards, -Payal
