On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Andy Gayton wrote: >It'd be a shame .. see how things go. So far I don't think we would >have missed many worthwhile contributions by putting up a slight hurdle >to contributors. On the other hand - negative comments could help the >wiki grow .. it might be good to have a frank and honest comparison of >the IMAP servers out there + a page to list people's uses of binc.
Yup :-) >> Do you have web logs indicating where the activity came from? If so, we >> could easily check for repeated access from the wiki vandal. >Just the standard apache logs. It looks like the vandal came in from: >216.150.131.207 and our repairer on: 66.167.121.250 ... it's pretty >jumbled though. Don't know if this is a coincidence, but check out the RDP login line on this link: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=216.150.131.207&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=3Lreb.23423%24Kq4.17124376%40news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net&rnum=1 >>>Thanks also to whoever went through and repaired the site so promptly. >> Indeed! Are we sure that there isn't any junk left anywhere? >Yup - At the bottom of every page there's a 'recent changes' link, which >shows links to recently changed pages. You can then follow a link to a >page which has been changed and clicked on 'page revisions' at the >bottom of the page - which shows the changes for that page in diff form. >I do a bit of a check through every couple of weeks or so, mostly out of >curiousity. Binc's too solid :) .. Having something that just works >makes it hard to find the motivation to check in more often. It's cool >there's someone else out there who must be going through as well. True. Stable software is kind of boring ;-). But that's why we have 1.3, and once it's mature enough for a 1.3.0 release (shouldn't be very long now), we're sure to get loads of activity again. Andy :-) -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | "It is better not to do something http://www.bincimap.org/ | than to do it poorly."
