I'm using "ESV" Bind version, the rpm package dedicated for RHEL-compatible doesn't contains these 2 files and someone says depends on packaging worker of repository. Why should I use 9.20.23 version ?
Il giorno gio 28 mag 2026 alle ore 08:08 Greg Choules <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > Hello Renzo. > > There have been so many changes since 9.11.4 I would suggest that you don't > get hung up on a couple of files. If you are installing 9.18.49 as a package, > it will contain everything it needs. > I would recommend that, if you are planning a jump from 9.11 anyway, that you > consider 9.20.23 rather than 9.19.49. > > Regards, Greg > > On Thu, 28 May 2026 at 07:00, Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> in Alma Linux 9 I have decide to migrate to latest ISC-Bind (rpm package) >> which is 9.18.49 version (Copr/Epel 9 repository) >> Previous bind 9.11.4 contains these 'include' entries: >> >> named.rfc1912.zones >> named.root.key >> >> These files don't exist inside isc-bind rpm packages >> I think the former is about default zones (e.g. localhost) the latter is >> about dnssec keys. >> >> I'd like using standard files according to isc-bind documents. >> How should I proceed ? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> -- >> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from >> this list. -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list.
