As I said, 9.11.4 is so very old, many changes have happened since then so please don't get hung up on two files.
This explains how to obtain ISC official packages https://kb.isc.org/docs/isc-packages-for-bind-9#open-source-packages You should consider 9.20 because of this: https://www.isc.org/blogs/2026-05-12-bind-security-updates/ I hope that helps. On Thu, 28 May 2026 at 07:43, Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm using "ESV" Bind version, the rpm package dedicated for > RHEL-compatible doesn't contains these 2 files and someone says > depends on packaging worker of repository. > Why should I use 9.20.23 version ? > > > Il giorno gio 28 mag 2026 alle ore 08:08 Greg Choules > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > > Hello Renzo. > > > > There have been so many changes since 9.11.4 I would suggest that you > don't get hung up on a couple of files. If you are installing 9.18.49 as a > package, it will contain everything it needs. > > I would recommend that, if you are planning a jump from 9.11 anyway, > that you consider 9.20.23 rather than 9.19.49. > > > > Regards, Greg > > > > On Thu, 28 May 2026 at 07:00, Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> in Alma Linux 9 I have decide to migrate to latest ISC-Bind (rpm > package) which is 9.18.49 version (Copr/Epel 9 repository) > >> Previous bind 9.11.4 contains these 'include' entries: > >> > >> named.rfc1912.zones > >> named.root.key > >> > >> These files don't exist inside isc-bind rpm packages > >> I think the former is about default zones (e.g. localhost) the latter > is about dnssec keys. > >> > >> I'd like using standard files according to isc-bind documents. > >> How should I proceed ? > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list. >
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list.
