>This explains how to obtain ISC official packages >https://kb.isc.org/docs/isc-packages-for-bind-9#open-source-packages >You should consider 9.20 because of this: >https://www.isc.org/blogs/2026-05-12-bind-security-updates/
So you suggest to migrate from ESV-BIND to BIND (rpm 9.20.23) ? I chose ESV bind because it has life cycle longer than stable bind Link, which you indicated, says It will end maintenance for 9.18 and 9.18-S at the end of June 2026 and efforts will be fixed efforts on vulnerabilities in the 9.20 and 9.21 branches. Do you know when 9.20 rpm esv-bind will be available ? Il giorno gio 28 mag 2026 alle ore 08:58 Greg Choules <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > As I said, 9.11.4 is so very old, many changes have happened since then so > please don't get hung up on two files. > > This explains how to obtain ISC official packages > https://kb.isc.org/docs/isc-packages-for-bind-9#open-source-packages > You should consider 9.20 because of this: > https://www.isc.org/blogs/2026-05-12-bind-security-updates/ > > I hope that helps. > > On Thu, 28 May 2026 at 07:43, Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm using "ESV" Bind version, the rpm package dedicated for >> RHEL-compatible doesn't contains these 2 files and someone says >> depends on packaging worker of repository. >> Why should I use 9.20.23 version ? >> >> >> Il giorno gio 28 mag 2026 alle ore 08:08 Greg Choules >> <[email protected]> ha scritto: >> > >> > Hello Renzo. >> > >> > There have been so many changes since 9.11.4 I would suggest that you >> > don't get hung up on a couple of files. If you are installing 9.18.49 as a >> > package, it will contain everything it needs. >> > I would recommend that, if you are planning a jump from 9.11 anyway, that >> > you consider 9.20.23 rather than 9.19.49. >> > >> > Regards, Greg >> > >> > On Thu, 28 May 2026 at 07:00, Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> in Alma Linux 9 I have decide to migrate to latest ISC-Bind (rpm package) >> >> which is 9.18.49 version (Copr/Epel 9 repository) >> >> Previous bind 9.11.4 contains these 'include' entries: >> >> >> >> named.rfc1912.zones >> >> named.root.key >> >> >> >> These files don't exist inside isc-bind rpm packages >> >> I think the former is about default zones (e.g. localhost) the latter is >> >> about dnssec keys. >> >> >> >> I'd like using standard files according to isc-bind documents. >> >> How should I proceed ? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe >> >> from this list. -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list.
